This snapshot, taken on
05/04/2010
, shows web content acquired for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search may not work in archived websites and contact details are likely to be out of date.
 
 
The UK Government Web Archive does not use cookies but some may be left in your browser from archived websites.



Posts Tagged ‘demand’

h1

How DFID supports demand-responsive research – Messages from the outreach

January 21, 2008

To prepare its future research strategy, DFID launched a public consultation exercise in 2007. This posting highlights some of the key messages on how DFID can support demand-responsive research.

Forge better links with end-users.

At the micro-level DFID should improve links with development projects which can provide valuable information to contribute to its research strategies.

Incorporating research components into development initiatives (similar to M+E, gender and communications components which are commonly embedded into development programmes) will be the most responsive way to respond to user demand at the grass roots level.

Work with ‘innovation systems’ that bring together all actors in a commodity chain to address a variety of problems. The sum of the network parts is much greater than the individual institutions … Working in such ‘networks’ seems to be a promising way to really articulate demands and connect them with capacities

Ask the “poor” people: Include the communities’ viewpoints and ideas in ALL program design

Fund alliances instead of individual organizations – encourage NGO’s to work together so as to leverage resources

“Basket funding” for our organisations will give us room for creating thinking, institutional building and research training for members of staff.

Initiate and support multi-stakeholder ‘foundations’ or similar bodies particularly existing well-established and functional councils, fora, foundations etc.

Develop a broader programmatic approach to build capacity and strategic focus for pro-development and pro-poor research within existing research institutions and with strong links to private sector i.e. build the linkages for private sector to link with research institutions to conduct research which will impact upon poor through increased sustainable economic growth.

Develop research networks and public-private partnerships. It is essential to promote the steady growth of collaborative international research networks as the principal means for mobilizing scientific talent to tackle common problems.

The multi-agency approach works if a single agency is leading on implementation i.e. funders are pooling their funds into an agreed management group, foundation or govt. department. It doesn’t work when different agencies in the multi-agency funding
arrangement have differing roles to play (which are supposedly complementary).

Research will be best implemented by professional international research institutions that have a presence in target countries and regions, and have a long history of partnering with local institutions.

There are a lot of people’s initiatives that are organized by themselves. They are not taking any help from outside. They are even self-funded. Their resource is self managed, sometimes they are using also their own indigenous knowledge. They are running well and DFID should learn how these people’s initiatives are getting implemented, how they are solving their own problems without any outside help or support, and replicate through other peoples, to other organizations. [Bangladesh]

DFID does need to improve the coordination of its research globally, nationally and within DFID itself. It needs to link research more to its development dominant projects and make use of the resources and facilities available rather than separate research initiatives that may be even implemented without the knowledge of projects and country offices.

DFID should take care not to continue its current trend of passing on higher and higher transaction costs to agencies implementing research by engaging them in lower overall budget, no overhead, highly competitive (by restricting funds from elsewhere), high contributions and too many partners in multi-stakeholder projects.

Research managed out of DFID-UK through small projects (that even country offices are not aware of) are an expensive and isolated form of research.


Download the full report (pdf format). The Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa and DNet Bangladesh also provided longer contributions to this phase of the process.


To prepare its future research strategy, DFID launched a public consultation exercise in 2007.

Between August and November 2007, some 600 people responded to an online survey through the DFID web site. A further 12-question survey coordinated by Euforic mobilised a further 100 contributions as well as longer submissions from DNet Bangladesh and the Forum for African Agricultural Research. A series of face to face meetings were also held in Bangladesh, China, Ethiopia, India, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda.

Get more information on DFID-funded research:

View outputs of DFID-funded research
Sign up for email alerts

h1

Making research demand responsive – What the survey says

January 3, 2008

To prepare its future research strategy, DFID launched a public consultation exercise in 2007.

This posting gives a flavour of the contributions to the initial DFID survey on the question: How can DFID improve the way research responds to user demand?

There was a general feeling that any research programme should provide for the participation of user representatives. Research directed to solving real society problems requires stakeholder participation in defining the problems and, ideally, the type of solutions they would like to have.

The process of user engagement needs to take account of and be sensitive to the priorities of those not strongly represented. In the context of planned decentralisation, it will be important to develop and plan approaches which draw in a wide range of stakeholders and do not reproduce existing inequalities around research support, knowledge generation and agenda setting.

Consulting with individuals and groups that represent a broad range of interests and expertise to identify knowledge gaps and develop a research agenda is a critical first step in setting research agenda’s that represent a consensus of priorities on what can be implemented, and how.

Developing countries also need to be empowered to generate their own ideas about development, so they can take ownership of their development processes, including research, and develop effective responses to the challenges they face.


To prepare its future research strategy, DFID launched a public consultation exercise in 2007.Between August and November 2007, some 600 people responded to an online survey through the DFID web site. A further 12-question survey coordinated by Euforic mobilised a further 100 contributions as well as longer submissions from DNet Bangladesh and the Forum for African Agricultural Research. A series of face to face meetings were also held in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Nigeria and Uganda.Get more information on DFID-funded research:

View outputs of DFID-funded research
Sign up for email alerts